The selection of bidder must comply with the forms and methods of selection.[1] The selection forms include: open bidding,[2] limited bidding,[3] direct appointment,[4] competitive offer,[5] direct procurement,[6] self-implementation,[7] centralised procurements,[8] regular procurement[9] and purchase of medicine, and medical equipment.[10]
[1] Chapter II, Bidding Law.
[2] Article 20, Bidding Law.
[3] Article 21, Bidding Law.
[4] Article 22, Bidding Law.
[5] Article 23, Bidding Law.
[6] Article 24, Bidding Law.
[7] Article 25, Bidding Law.
[8] Chapter V, Item 1, Bidding Law.
[9] Chapter V, Item 2, Bidding Law.
[10] Chapter V, Item 3, Bidding Law.
[11] Article 28, Bidding Law.
[12] Article 29, Bidding Law.
[13] Article 30, Bidding Law.
[14] Article 31, Bidding Law.
[15] Article 39, Bidding Law.
[16] Article 39.1, Bidding Law.
[17] Article 39.2, Bidding Law.
[18] Article 39.3, Bidding Law.
[19] Article 39.4, Bidding Law.
[20] Article 43.1, Bidding Law.
[21] Article 40, Bidding Law.
[22] Article 40.1(a), Bidding Law.
[23] Article 40.1(b), Bidding Law.
[24] Article 40.1(c), Bidding Law.
[25] Article 40.1(d), Bidding Law.
[26] Article 40.2, Bidding Law.
[27] Article 42.1, Bidding Law.
[28] Article 40.3, Bidding Law.
[29] Article 42.2, Bidding Law.
[30] Article 58, Bidding Law.
Yes, prequalification is an option. The Bidding Law provides that depending on the size and characteristics of a bidding package, a prequalification round can be conducted to serve as a basis for the bid solicitor to make a short list of contractor.[1] Dossier of invitation to prequalification includes documents specifying requirements on capacity and experience of contractors or investors which are necessary to serve as the basis for the bid solicitor to select a short list of contractors or investors.[2]
The prequalification requirements are prepared by a bid solicitor.[3] Contents of prequalification requirements are approved by the project owner,[4] while the prequalification requirements, prequalification results must be approved by the competent person.[5]
[1] Article 4.7, Bidding Law..
[2] Article 4.27, Bidding Law.
[3] Article 75.1(a), Bidding Law.
[4] Article 74.1(b), Bidding Law.
[5] Article 73.8(b), Bidding Law.
Yes.
[1] Article 6.1, Bidding Law.
[2] Article 6.2, Bidding Law.
[3] Article 6.3, Bidding Law.
[4] Article 2.4, Decree No. 63.
[5] Article 6.4, Bidding Law.
[6] Article 6.4, Bidding Law.
[7] Article 2.1, Decree No. 30.
Yes, in the case of a partnership, there must be a written agreement between the partners specifying the person heading the partnership and the general and specific responsibilities of each partner with respect to the bidding package works.[1]
There is no specific limitations under Competition Law.
However, based on Competition Law, where there is a collusion between participating bidders in order for one or more parties to win a bid for supply of goods and services, such act is classified as agreement in restraint competition.[2] The collusion between participating bidders mean: (i) where one or more parties to the agreement withdraw from participating in the bidding or retract their submitted bids so that one or more parties to the agreement will win the bid; (ii) where one or more parties to an agreement cause difficulties to non-parties to the agreement who participate in the bidding, by refusing to supply raw materials or sign subcontracts or otherwise; (iii) all parties to an agreement agree to offer non-competitive bids or competitive bids accompanied with conditions which are unacceptable to the bid solicitor so as to pre-determine the parties or party who will win the bid; (iv) all parties to an agreement pre-determine the number of times each party will win the bid for a given period of time; and (v) other acts prohibited by law.[3]
Consequently, the violators of the goods and/or services provisions agreement shall be subject to (i) a monetary fine equivalent to 10% of their turnover of the financial year before the year where the violation is committed;[4] (ii) confiscation of the profit from the violation (where applicable),[5] and (iii) removal of illegal clauses from the agreement (where applicable).[6]
[1] Article 5.3, Bidding Law.
[2] Article 8.8, Competition Law.
[3] Article 21, Decree No. 116/2005.
[4] Article 15.1, Decree No. 71/2014.
[5] Article 8.2(a), Decree No. 71/2014.
[6] Article 8.2(b), Decree No. 71/2014.
There is no express provision dealing with the change of consortium bidders during a procurement procedure. However, any documents sent by contractors to bid solicitors after the time of bid closing to modify or supplement the submitted bid dossiers shall be regard as invalid, except documents sent by contractors to clarify bid dossier at the request of bid solicitors or documents to prove contractors' eligibility, capacity and experience.[1]
In addition, regarding the validity of the bid dossiers, the evaluation shall base on evaluation criteria and other requirements stated in bidding dossiers, submitted bid dossiers and contractors' documents explaining and clarifying their bid dossier in order to select fully capable and experienced contractors that have feasible solutions to perform the bidding packages.[2] At the time of signing, selected contractor must satisfy requirements on technical and financial capacity for execution of bidding packages.[3]
Therefore, if the change in consortium bidders is made after the time of bid closing, the bid can be rejected as a result of the bid failing to satisfy requirements for the bidding dossier.[4]
[1] Article 14.3(b), Decree No. 63
[2] Article 15.1, Decree No. 63.
[3] Article 64.2, Bidding Law.
[4] Article 17.1, Bidding Law.
Yes, because under the Bidding law, contractors must be legally and financially independent from (i) the project owners, bid solicitor; (ii) consultancy contractors that prepare, examine and appraise engineering and cost estimation dossiers; consultancy contractors who prepare, appraise bidding dossiers and dossiers of requirements; consultancy contractors who evaluate bid dossiers and dossiers of proposals; and consultancy contractors who appraise results of selection of contractors for the respective bidding package; (iii) other contractors participating in bidding in a bidding package with regarding to limited bidding.[1]
[1] Article 6.2, Bidding Law.