When transposing the EU-Directives, Austrian public procurement law offers several different ways to award a contract. Contracting authorities may employ the following procedures:
As a general rule, the open procedure as well as the restricted procedure are always permissible. In the Utilities sector, contracting authorities can also always choose a negotiated procedure (two-step-procedure) with call for competition. Circumstances which exceptionally permit the negotiated procedure, the competitive dialogue or the innovation partnership are determined in the procurement provisions. Direct awards, as the only non-competitive option, are only admissible in very exceptional cases and if an estimated contract value of (currently) 100.000 euros is not reached (please refer to 7. below).
In implementation of Art. 22 of the Directive 2014/24/EU, Austrian procurement law obliges contracting authorities to use electronic means for the entire procurement procedure by 18 October 2018 if the threshold values contained in the European Directives are equalled or exceeded.
Additionally, Austrian procurement law list electronic methods and tools for procurement procedures which are at present already available (see above point 3. a. "dynamic procurement system" and "electronic auction").
Meanwhile, central purchasing bodies (e.g. Austrian Ministries) already have to use electronic means for the entire procurement procedure by 2017.
For public procurement procedures below the threshold values, the use of electronic means is not mandatory by 18 October 2018.
EU-wide calls for bids are published on the website Bids Electronic Daily (TED):
TED is the online version of the Supplement to the Official Journal of the EU, dedicated to European public procurement.
In Austria, procurement procedures can be viewed on the websites:
Yes, certain prospective bidders can be excluded from the competition in case they are lacking sufficient reliability. According to provisions in the BVergG, bidders who have been convicted of any of the offences listed therein have to be excluded from the competition. The relevant offences include, in particular, forming criminal organizations, money laundering, fraud and giving bribes as an incentive to the recipient’s violating his official duties.
The contracting authority may furthermore exclude a bidder in cases of anticompetitive behaviour (e.g. if the respective bidder has entered into an agreement with other bidders aimed at distorting competition or if the respective bidder has made attempts to unduly influence the contracting authority), bankruptcy or upcoming insolvency, a grave professional misconduct, a conflict of interest, a prior involvement in the preparation of the tender procedure which grants the respective bidder an competitive advantage which cannot be balanced otherwise (see also below under e.), or supplying misleading information during the procurement procedure. In any case the exclusion has to be proportionate, the respective bidder always has to be given the right to be heard upfront.