Yes. Generally, a creditor is able to take security over all types of assets, including working capital assets and accounts receivable. Security can be taken over both movable and immovable property. Security is most commonly affected over the following:
Business rescue
Business rescue proceedings are regulated in terms of Chapter 6 of the Companies Act, 2008 ("2008 Companies Act"). The proceedings seek to facilitate the rehabilitation of a company that is "financially distressed" by providing for the temporary supervision of the company and the management of its affairs as well as a temporary moratorium of the rights of creditors against the company, and the restructuring and reorganizing of the affairs of the business, property, debt and other liabilities and equities of the company. Furthermore, business rescue provides for the development and implementation of a business rescue plan, which seeks to maximize the likelihood that the company will continue to exist on a solvent basis in the future, or where it is not possible for the company to continue on a solvent basis, to ensure a better return for the company's creditors and shareholders than would result from the (immediate) liquidation of the company.
In order for Business Rescue proceedings to be initiated, either the company must be capable of being rescued or it must result in a better outcome for creditors or shareholders than if the company were to be liquidated. Business Rescue proceedings can be initiated in one of two ways:
The winding up of a company, also known as liquidation, results in the dissolution of that company and the distribution of its assets among the company's creditors according to their ranking.
Liquidation proceedings can be either voluntary or compulsory, and the process is regulated in terms of different legislation depending on whether the company is solvent or insolvent. Solvent companies are woundup in accordance with the 2008 Companies Act, whereas insolvent companies are wound up in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 1973 ("1973 Companies Act").
For a solvent company, the company may be voluntarily wound up by shareholders through the adoption of a special resolution. The resolution must be filed with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC). The resolution must state whether the winding-up is a members' voluntary winding up or a creditors' voluntary winding up. The following apply in the case of a voluntary winding up by the company:
The compulsory winding-up of a solvent company is initiated through an application to a competent court, accompanied by an affidavit by the party making the application. A court, with jurisdiction, may order that a solvent company be wound up in any of the following scenarios:
An insolvent company may be wound up by the court or voluntarily by the company's creditors or its members through the passing of a resolution.
A court may grant an order for winding up an insolvent company, if one of the following has occurred:
If the application to wind up an insolvent company is successful, the company will be declared insolvent and the company will no longer proceed to operate its business.
Compromise (creditors' scheme of arrangement)
A compromise is a voluntary process, provided for in section 155 of the 2008 Companies Act, whereby the board of directors or the liquidator appointed to wind-up a company may propose an arrangement or a compromise of its financial obligations to all, or any class of, its creditors.
A compromise under this section can also provide for a special or alternative means of winding up a company or for the takeover of a company and the termination of the process of the winding-up on the basis of, for example, an acquisition of all its issued shares and its creditors' claims, subject to the discharge of the provisional, or the setting aside of the final, winding-up order.
Section 155 prescribes a process whereby:
Business rescue
The company must be in "financial distress." This means that the company must appear to be reasonably unlikely to pay all of its debts as they become due and payable within the immediately ensuing six months. A company will also be considered to be in "financial distress" if it appears reasonably likely that the company will become insolvent within the immediately ensuing six months. Regardless of the nature of the "financial distress," for business rescue proceedings to be initiated, there must either be a reasonable prospect of rescuing the company or the outcome of the business rescue proceedings must deliver a better outcome for creditors or shareholders than if the company were to be liquidated.
Liquidation
A company does not have to be insolvent for liquidation proceedings to be initiated (see section above on solvent companies). In the case of an insolvent company, a company will be deemed insolvent for purposes of liquidation proceedings when its liabilities, fairly estimated, exceed its assets, fairly valued and/or it is unable to pay its debts as and when they fall due in the ordinary course of business.
The 1973 Companies Act provides a number of circumstances in which a competent court can wind up an insolvent company, which include the following:
Compromise (creditors' scheme of arrangement)
There is no solvency requirement. The company must not already be engaged in business rescue proceedings. However, this process can still be followed if the company has commenced a winding-up or liquidation process.
Business rescue
Only companies incorporated in South Africa and foreign companies that have subsequently been registered as a domestic company in South Africa can be placed into liquidation or business rescue in South Africa under the 2008 Companies Act or the 1973 Companies Act. These processes would not apply to a foreign company registered as an "external company" in South Africa.
Liquidation
Only companies incorporated in South Africa and foreign companies that have subsequently been registered as a domestic company in South Africa can be placed into liquidation or business rescue in South Africa under the 2008 Companies Act or the 1973 Companies Act. These processes would not apply to a foreign company registered as an "external company" in South Africa.
Compromise (creditors' scheme of arrangement)
Compromise under the 2008 Companies Act can only be used in relation to companies incorporated in South Africa and foreign companies that have, subsequent to their incorporation, been registered as a domestic company in South Africa. This process would not apply to a foreign company registered as an "external company" in South Africa.
Business rescue
Yes. However, such rearrangement must be provided for in the business rescue plan and subsequently approved by the majority of creditors.
Liquidation
A liquidator may propose an arrangement or compromise with the company's creditors. This would need to be implemented in accordance with the provisions of section 155 of the 2008 Companies Act, which provides for a scheme of arrangement with creditors. This provision is available for both solvent and insolvent companies. See responses under the heading "Compromise" for more detail.
Compromise (creditors' scheme of arrangement)
Yes. Each class of creditors affected by the proposal will need to vote on and approve the proposed scheme of arrangement. Thus, groups of creditors having similar rights would be formed, including secured creditors and different classes of unsecured creditors.
Business rescue
Yes.
For purposes of creditors' voting rights on a business rescue plan, section 145 (4) of the 2008 Companies Act classifies creditors as secured, unsecured and concurrent creditors. A secured or unsecured creditor has a voting interest equal to the value of the amount owed to that creditor by the company. Meanwhile, a concurrent creditor who would be subordinated in liquidation has a voting interest, as independently and expertly appraised and valued at the request of the practitioner, equal to the amount, if any, that the creditor could reasonably expect to receive in a liquidation of the company.
There is a further classification of creditors as "independent creditors," as follows:
Liquidation
Yes, in general terms:
Compromise (creditors' scheme of arrangement)
Yes. For the purpose of assessing the merits of a proposed scheme, the ranking of creditors and shareholders for distributions from an insolvent estate is taken into account. In this scenario, distributions to shareholders generally rank behind creditors' claims. The priority of claims are (in very general terms) as follows:
Business rescue
No
Liquidation
This depends on the type of liquidation process being followed. For voluntary liquidation proceedings, a special resolution by shareholders must be passed in order to place the company in liquidation. However, no resolution is required where the company is placed in compulsory liquidation.
Compromise (creditors' scheme of arrangement)
Generally, no (except to the extent that shareholders have a claim as creditors of the company).
Business rescue
Yes, especially in circumstances where the business rescue plan would alter the rights associated with the class of securities the shareholder falls within.
Business rescue
No plan in a liquidation needs to be voted on, and as such, only shareholders that are creditors will be afforded an opportunity to prove their claim in the liquidation.
Business rescue
Yes. Shareholders would be required to approve a proposed compromise if the proposal would also affect the rights of shareholders (for example, by diluting their shareholding or amending the rights attaching to existing shares).
Business rescue
Yes. A business rescue plan will be approved preliminarily if it was supported by the holders of more than 75% of the creditors' voting interests that were voted, and the votes in support of the proposed plan included at least 50% of the independent creditor's voting interests, if any, that were voted.
A business rescue plan that has been adopted is binding on the company as well as on each of its creditors and every holder of the company's securities, regardless of whether the person was present at the meeting, voted in favor of the plan or, in the case of creditors, has proved its claim.
If the business rescue plan was rejected, a creditor may make a binding offer to purchase the voting interests of one or more persons who opposed the adoption of the business rescue plan, at a value independently and expertly determined to be the fair and reasonable estimate of the return that such person or persons would receive if the company were to be placed in liquidation.
Yes. Any court order to wind up the company will be final and binding on all creditors. In liquidating and distributing the company's assets, the liquidator may also enter into a scheme of arrangement/compromise with creditors in accordance with section 155 of the 2008 Companies Act - see further "Compromise."
Compromise (creditors' scheme of arrangement)
Yes. The creditors of a company will adopt a proposal, or a class of creditors, if a majority approves it (in number) of creditors present and voting at a meeting of those creditors called for that purpose and the claims of the creditors approving the proposal represent at least 75% in value of all creditors' claims or claims of that class of creditors, present and voting at a meeting of those creditors called for that purpose.
If the proposal is approved by the creditors voting at the creditors' meeting(s), then the company must (in order to make the compromise final and binding on all creditors) apply to a competent court in order for the compromise to be sanctioned.
A dissenting creditor can oppose this application to a competent court, but in order to be successful with such opposition, a creditor must show that it would be just and equitable for the court to reject the scheme.