6. Special issues
Jump to
6. Special issues Start Comparison
6.1 Battered woman syndrome

6.1.1 Can lawyers present evidence of battered woman syndrome or other domestic abuse as an affirmative defense to crimes that the battered woman has committed? (Note: Battered Woman Syndrome is accepted by courts in certain jurisdictions to show that battered women can use force to defend themselves and sometimes kill their abusers due to abusive and life-threatening situations.)
Parole boards should consider any information or evidence of battered women syndrome in their decisions, where it appears the criminal behavior was a result of victimization. According to the Board of Parole Hearings: California Code of Regulations Title 15 Section 2239, a history of abuse is not expressly a defense to a criminal act. However, evidence of domestic abuse or “intimate partner battering” is relevant in the context of a claim to self-defense as stated in People v. Humphrey, 921 P.2d 1 (1996).
6.2 Domestic violence in the workplace

6.2.1 Can courts issue orders to protect employees suffering from domestic violence?

Courts can make orders to protect an employee from suffering unlawful violence or credible threats of violence at the workplace including the following:

  • no harassment or threatening of the employee
  • no contact or proximity of the employee
  • no possession of guns

An employer must request a workplace violence restraining order on behalf of an employee who needs protection. The court order can last up to three years and the order can also protect the employee’s certain family or household members and other employees at the employee’s workplace or at the employer’s other workplaces.

These orders will be enforced by law enforcement agencies.[14]
6.2.2 Can departure be deemed "for good cause" if related to domestic violence?

Section 1256 of the California Unemployment Insurance Code provides that a claimant may be deemed to have left work for good cause when the claimant leaves work because of “domestic violence abuse.”

In addition, Section 1032 provides that an employer’s reserve account is not subject to charges if it is determined the claimant quit with good cause due to domestic violence abuse.[15]

In determining eligibility for benefits, the code provides that:

An individual may be deemed to have left his or her most recent work with good cause if he or she leaves employment to protect his or her children, or himself or herself from domestic violence abuse.

The claimant’s spouse does not have to be the source of the abuse or threat of abuse, to find good cause for the claimant to leave work. The abuser may be a spouse, a partner, “significant other,” a stalker, etc. To establish that a person has good cause to quit due to domestic violence abuse, the following must be established:

  1. An act or threat of domestic violence abuse occurred.
  2. The claimant or the claimant’s children are the intended victims of the domestic violence abuse.
  3. The claimant has a restraining order, a police report or some other information that identifies the source of the abuse and/or verifies the abuse or threat of abuse.
  4. A leave of absence or a transfer was not available, or would not have resolved the problem, e.g., the claimant has a restraining order against the abuser, but the abuser violates the restraining order.
6.2.3 Can family members of domestic violence victims take reasonable leave to help the victim seek treatment or obtain help and services?
  • The California Labor Code 230(c) allows for an employee to take time off to obtain or attempt to obtain any relief. Relief includes, but is not limited to, a temporary restraining order, restraining order or other injunctive relief, to help ensure the health, safety or welfare of the victim or their child.
  • State employees are entitled to take leave and use any eligible leave credits available to them to attend to certain family crisis situations.
6.3 Immigration

6.3.1 Does the law include provisions that are intended to prevent abusers who are citizens or permanent residents from using immigration laws to perpetrate domestic violence against their spouse?
California passed SB 785 in May 2018. This is a bill that prevents the disclosure of the immigration status when individuals come forward to participate in court cases as victims or witnesses, when their immigration status is not relevant to the facts of the case.
6.3.2 If battered immigrants cooperate with law enforcement in domestic violence, can they obtain immigration remedies?
In the United States, the federal government usually provides immigration law protections. VAWA contains provisions that are intended to prevent abusers who are United States citizens or permanent residents from using immigration laws to perpetrate domestic violence against their spouse, including allowing battered immigrant spouses to obtain legal immigrant status without having to rely on the cooperation of the abusive spouse. Battered immigrants who cooperate with law enforcement officials in investigating or prosecuting acts of domestic violence may also qualify for a U visa.
6.3.3 Does domestic violence law discuss asylum accessibility?
Foreign victims of severe domestic violence and sexual abuse may qualify for asylum status as part of the “membership in a particular social group” category.[16]
6.4 Armed forces

6.4.1 Can a victim seek a military protective order if the abuser is in active military?
Yes. 10 USC Code §1567(a) permits military commanders to issue protective orders prohibiting contact or communication with the protected person and is often used in cases concerning abuse by filing DD Form 2873.
6.5 Child custody and child/spousal support

6.5.1 Do judges follow special rules to determine custody or visitation of children in domestic violence cases?
Yes. In domestic violence cases (where a parent has been convicted in a criminal court or there has been a finding of domestic violence in the past five years), the judge must follow Family Code Section 3044 to determine custody or visitation of children. Under Family Code Section 3044, there is a rebuttable presumption that awarding custody to a perpetrator of domestic violence is not in the best interests of the child, and this presumption may only be rebutted by a preponderance of evidence based on specific factors outlined by the code.
6.5.2 Can the judge consider the testimonies of the other spouse and the children when determining custody?

Yes. Per Family Code Section 3042, a court must consider the wishes of a child old enough to form “intelligent preference as to custody or visitation” and per Family Code Section 3080, there is a presumption, affecting the burden of proof, that joint custody is in the best interests of the child where the parents have agreed.

Information around coercive family violence under the Divorce Act

On 29 September 2020, California S.B. 1141, Chapter 238 was signed into law, which amended Family Code Section 6320 to clarify that conduct used to establish “coercive control” constitutes abuses under California’s Domestic Violence Prevention Act.

6.6 Housing rights of domestic violence victims

6.6.1 Does the law include any barriers to prevent landlords from forcing a tenant to move out because they are victims of domestic violence?

Yes. The California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1161.3 stops landlords from making tenants who have been victims of domestic violence move out so long as the abuse has been documented by either a protective order, police report or a qualified third party acting in his or her professional capacity. However, a landlord may end, or refuse to renew, a tenancy if, after giving three days’ notice to correct, (i) the victim allowed the abuser to visit the property, or (ii) the abuser is a physical threat to other tenants or their invitees or their right to use the property.

6.6.2 Does the law allow a tenant to terminate his/her lease early due to domestic violence?

Yes. The California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1946.7 allows a victim of domestic violence to terminate his or her lease early so long as the tenant provides documented proof that verifies that the abuse occurred. The notice of termination must be given within 180 days of the protective order or police report being issued or within 180 days after the violence occurred. In such case, the victim will be responsible for paying rent for no more than 14 calendar days following delivery to the landlord of the tenant’s termination notice.

6.6.3 Can an order exclude the abuser from the residence?
Yes. Per Family Code Section 6321, the court may issue an ex parte order excluding a party from a dwelling regardless of which party holds title to the property. Family Code 6234 allows the court to make a temporary move out order, and Family Code 6340 allows the court to issue an order excluding the abuser from the dwelling if it finds that physical or emotional harm would be forced upon the other party or to a minor or person under the care of the victim. Furthermore, a California Appellate Court ruling in 2020[17] reinforced the court’s authority to exclude the abuser from the property regardless of whether the issue of ownership in the property was still being determined in a pending civil suit.
6.6.4 Can abusers be forbidden by court orders to alienate or mortgage the property in his/her name if it is the family domicile?

Yes. Per Family Code Section 2045, a spouse or registered domestic partner who is a victim of domestic violence may ask the court (by completing Form DV-100) to issue a domestic violence restraining order prohibiting the abuser from disposing of property, real or personal, whether community, quasi-community or separate, except in the usual course of business or for necessities of life. A judge may also order the abuser to notify the victim of any proposed extraordinary expenditures.

6.7 Privacy and confidentiality laws

The California Invasion of Privacy Act makes wiretapping a crime and allows victims to file civil suits to recover compensation for the invasion of privacy. However, there are some exceptions to this law. Per Penal Code Section 633.5, victims of certain crimes, including domestic violence, may legally record confidential communications if there is a reasonable belief that the communications relate to the crime, and Penal Code Section 633.6 allows a victim to use such communications as evidence to obtain a restraining order. The law also provides that a court may grant in a domestic violence restraining order permission for the victim to record confidential communication made by the perpetrator of the crime.

California has created a Safe at Home (codified in Government Code Sections 6205-6216) program administered by the secretary of state’s office that offers victims of domestic violence a substitute mailing address in order to keep the victim from being tracked down by their perpetrator.