Where Specialized Police Commissions on Protection against Family Violence exist, they are the policing body to engage. Where they are not present, it is the local police station that steps in. Primary policing functions include:
In the event of flagrant offenses, the police will take the following action:
Law No. 30364, the Law to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence against Women and Members of the Family Group, defines police personnel responsibility to include:
It should be mentioned that even the women who report complaints suffer significant levels of victimization due to the abandonment of the government as a result of their evident vulnerable situation and also because of the presence of narratives that tend to justify the facts or "understand" the aggressor (chauvinist culture).[17] There are many situations in which police officers do not act effectively due to corruption or as a result of patriarchal attitudes and/or values.
Also, the problem is not only related to the lack of training and qualifications of many police officers or police procedures, but also the absence of a recognized institutional policy, learned and disseminated appropriately.
Note that we have not identified gaps within Law No. 30364 that would mean the protection of women is not ensured. However, in contrast with item 30(a) of Recommendation 35, the Peruvian legislation addressing gender-based violence against women is not very effective. This explains the increasing numbers of domestic violence cases in Peru:
In general, there are no circumstances that could affect the participation of law firms in police investigations. Victims have the right to appoint their defense attorney of choice to participate in all proceedings and have full access to the investigation.
However, the situation of vulnerability and mistreatment suffered by women who dare to file a complaint is enormous. For instance, filing a complaint is a long, bureaucratic and indolent process in most cases, which must be faced by a vulnerable and terrified family group that has no alternative but to sleep in the police station, in the street or to return to where only more violence awaits them.
This situation is also a consequence of the nonexistence of an immediate protection network that allows women and children to avoid ending up being direct and indirect victims of violence, or that prevents women from having to withdraw their complaints for fear of losing economic sustenance and even their home. Unlike what is stated in item 31 (a) (ii) of Recommendation 35, there are no mechanisms that include immediate risk assessments and protection to assist woman complainants and witnesses (e.g., wide range of effective measures and, where appropriate, the issuance and monitoring of eviction, protection, restraining or emergency barring orders against alleged perpetrators, including adequate sanctions for noncompliance).Proof is required in:
Regulations to Law No. 30364 only mention consent in Article 61, which pertains to sexual violence, and provides guidelines according to the following:
61.1. Consent cannot be inferred from any word or conduct of the victim when force, threat of force, coercion or exploitation of a coercive environment they have diminished their ability to give voluntary and free consent.
61.2. Consent cannot be inferred from any word or conduct of the victim when they are unable to give free consent.
61.3. Consent cannot be inferred from the silence or lack of resistance of the victim to the alleged rape.
61.4. The credibility, honorability or sexual availability of the victim or a witness cannot be inferred from the sexual nature of the previous or subsequent behavior of the victim or a witness.
However, there are no additional definitions of consent under other gender-based violence situations.
According to Article 165 of the Peruvian Criminal Procedure Code, the cases in which persons may refrain from testifying are as follows:
1. The spouse of the accused, relatives within the fourth degree of consanguinity or second of affinity, and anyone who had a relationship with him may refrain from giving testimony. This power is extended, to the same extent, to relatives by adoption, and to spouses or those cohabiting even when the marital bond has ceased. All of them will be warned of the right that allows them to refuse to give testimony in whole or in part.
2. Those who must keep professional or state secrets according to the law must refrain from declaring details that will be described,:
(a) Those bound by professional secrecy may not be bound to testify about what they know because of their profession, except in cases in which they have an obligation to report it to the judicial authority. Among them are lawyers, ministers of religious services, notaries, doctors and health personnel, journalists or other professionals provided by express law. Nevertheless, these persons, with the exception of ministers of religious cults, may not deny their testimony when they are released by the interested party of the duty to keep the secret.
(b) If the information requested from the witness is not found, taking into account the exceptions provided in the law on the matter, the continuation of the declaration will be provided. If the information has been classified as secret or reserved and the judge considers the information essential, they will — ex officio or at the request of a party — require the information in writing and may even summon the public official to correspond on the witness initially placed for clarifications.
3. If Public officials and servants know of a state secret, that is, information classified as secret or reserved, they have an obligation to communicate it to the authority that cited them. In these cases, the diligence will be suspended and information will be requested from the minister of the sector, within a period of 15 days, specifying whether the required information is within the scope of the exceptions established in the law on the matter.
According to Article 121(B) of the Criminal Code, when the victim is a minor, over 65, or suffers from a physical or mental disability and the agent takes advantage of this condition, a prison sentence of no less than six and no more than 12 years is applicable.
The Peruvian Criminal Code establishes penalties for anyone who commits crimes related to family violence; however, it does not establish specific penalties for first-time domestic violence offenses.
On the other hand, item 29(b) of Recommendation 35 states that states should protect victims/survivors of gender-based violence and ensure that they have access to justice and to an effective remedy in line with the guidance provided in General Recommendation No 33.
As indicated in item 5.1, the Peruvian legislation ensures the protection of women and children who suffer from domestic violence.[23] However, this is implemented poorly as most of the procedures are never completed. This explains the increasing cases of domestic violence in Peru.Yes, the Peruvian Criminal Code provides for the following penalties:
Peruvian Criminal Code — Article 108-B (Femicide)
Prison term of no less than 20 years for killing a woman as a result of any of the following:
Prison term of not less than 30 years if the following aggravating circumstances are present:
Life sentences in prison are applicable if two or more aggravating circumstances are present.
Peruvian Criminal Code — Article 441 (Intentional injury and negligent injury)
Peruvian Criminal Code — Article 442 (Mistreatment)
Community service of 50-80 days is applicable for physical or psychological mistreatment, humiliation, denigration or disparagement that does not cause injury or psychological damage. Community service of 80-100 working days is applicable under the following circumstances:
Peruvian Criminal Code — Article 121-B (Serious injuries due to violence against women and members of the family group)
A prison sentence of no less than six years and no more than 12 years may be imposed for a serious injury under the following circumstances:
A prison sentence of no less than 12 years and no more than 15 years may be imposed if two or more of the above circumstances are present. A prison sentence of no less than 15 years and no more than 20 years may be imposed if the victim dies as a result of the above circumstances and the aggressor was able to foresee the outcome.
Article 24 of the Law to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence against Women and Members of the Family Group Law No. 30364 provides that anyone who disobeys, fails to comply with or resists a protective measure issued in a proceeding arising from acts of violence against women or members of the family group commits the offense of resisting or disobeying the authority provided for in the Criminal Code.
Article 368 of the Peruvian Criminal Code provides that the disobedience of a protective order arising from an act constituting violence against women or members of the family group is punishable by a prison term of no less than five years and no more than eight years.The Law to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence against Women and Members of the Family Group Law No. 30364 provides the following:
Title II, Chapter 11, Article 22. Object and types of protective measures
Title II, Chapter I, Article 20. Sentence
In the case of a conviction or a reservation of conviction, this is in addition to the provisions of Article 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, promulgated by Legislative Decree No. 957, and where applicable, contains the following:
Title III, Chapter II, Article 31. Prison treatment for the social reintegration of aggressors deprived of their liberty
This provides for re-education treatment for the granting of prison benefits, pardons and commutations of sentences.
Title III, Chapter II, Article 32. Treatment of aggressors in a free environment
For crimes related to acts of violence against women and members of the family group, the judge may require the aggressor to participate in psychosocial, psychiatric or self-help treatment specialized in violence against women and members of the family group.
Law No. 30364 establishes many measures that are aligned with item 32 of Recommendation 35.