5. Prosecutorial considerations
Jump to
5. Prosecutorial considerations Start Comparison
5.1 Police procedures

5.1.1 When do the police get involved in domestic disputes or legal actions?

Where Specialized Police Commissions on Protection against Family Violence exist, they are the policing body to engage. Where they are not present, it is the local police station that steps in. Primary policing functions include:

  • maintaining order and protection for the victim
  • reporting investigation outcomes to prosecutorial authorities

In the event of flagrant offenses, the police will take the following action:

  • Assess the scene.
  • Arrest/restrain the aggressor.
  • Determine if the victim needs medical attention and arrange for transport to hospital.
  • Arrange for Women's Emergency Center (CEM) personnel to accompany the victim to care for the physical, emotional or legal needs of the victim.
  • Escort the aggressor and victim to the Specialized Police Commissions on Protection against Family Violence or a police station to file a report, and if appropriate, charge and arrest the aggressor.

Law No. 30364, the Law to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence against Women and Members of the Family Group, defines police personnel responsibility to include:

  • registering of the complaint
  • assessing the risk to the victim and taking action
  • forwarding the police report to the competent authority within the statutory period

It should be mentioned that even the women who report complaints suffer significant levels of victimization due to the abandonment of the government as a result of their evident vulnerable situation and also because of the presence of narratives that tend to justify the facts or "understand" the aggressor (chauvinist culture).[17] There are many situations in which police officers do not act effectively due to corruption or as a result of patriarchal attitudes and/or values.

Also, the problem is not only related to the lack of training and qualifications of many police officers or police procedures, but also the absence of a recognized institutional policy, learned and disseminated appropriately.

Note that we have not identified gaps within Law No. 30364 that would mean the protection of women is not ensured. However, in contrast with item 30(a) of Recommendation 35, the Peruvian legislation addressing gender-based violence against women is not very effective. This explains the increasing numbers of domestic violence cases in Peru:

  • According to ENDES 2019 (Demographic and Family Health Survey),[18] in the last 12 months, 2.5% of women between 15 and 49 years old have suffered sexual violence from their partners or former partners. According to ENARES 2015 (National Survey on Social Relationships),[19] 34.6% of adolescents between 12 and 17 years old have suffered sexual violence at some point during their lives.
  • In addition, in 2019, the Women's Emergency Centers (CEM) of the Ministry of Women, reported that of the 55,565 reported cases of violence against children and adolescents from 0 to 17 years old, 12,364 cases were due to sexual violence and 42% were connected to rape. [20] Among the 18 to 59 age group, out of 115,246 reported cases of violence, 5,523 cases were related to sexual violence and 48% connected to rape.
It is important to note that these statistics do not include the additional cases of violations that are never reported.
5.1.2 What circumstances effect law firm involvement?

In general, there are no circumstances that could affect the participation of law firms in police investigations. Victims have the right to appoint their defense attorney of choice to participate in all proceedings and have full access to the investigation.

However, the situation of vulnerability and mistreatment suffered by women who dare to file a complaint is enormous. For instance, filing a complaint is a long, bureaucratic and indolent process in most cases, which must be faced by a vulnerable and terrified family group that has no alternative but to sleep in the police station, in the street or to return to where only more violence awaits them.

This situation is also a consequence of the nonexistence of an immediate protection network that allows women and children to avoid ending up being direct and indirect victims of violence, or that prevents women from having to withdraw their complaints for fear of losing economic sustenance and even their home. Unlike what is stated in item 31 (a) (ii) of Recommendation 35, there are no mechanisms that include immediate risk assessments and protection to assist woman complainants and witnesses (e.g., wide range of effective measures and, where appropriate, the issuance and monitoring of eviction, protection, restraining or emergency barring orders against alleged perpetrators, including adequate sanctions for noncompliance).
5.2 Standard of proof

5.2.1 Is proof required by any legal means?

Proof is required in:

  • criminal cases: beyond reasonable doubt
  • civil cases: fair preponderance of the evidence
5.2.2 Are there any requirements regarding evidence and documents?
The Peruvian legal system is governed by the principle of freedom of proof, e.g., there is no closed list of evidence. On the contrary, the parties can offer the necessary means of proof to support their position. The only limitation is that the evidence must not be obtained in violation of fundamental rights (prohibited evidence).
5.2.3 Is proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" required?
Yes, in criminal cases.
5.2.4 Is the standard of proof different for ex parte orders?
No, it is the same as described above. 
5.3 Affirmative defenses

5.3.1 Are affirmative defenses available to the accused?
Yes, according to Article 20 of the Peruvian Criminal Code.
5.3.2 Is willful intent required?
The law provides sanctions for both negligence and willful misconduct. Indeed, according to Article 441 of the Peruvian Criminal Code, the one who, in any way, causes another person a painful injury that requires up to 10 days of assistance or rest, according to optional prescription, will be sentenced to community service for 40 to 60 days provided that circumstances do not concur that give seriousness to the event to the point that it will be considered a crime. It is considered an aggravating circumstance and the provision of community service will be increased to 80 days when the victim is under 14 years old or the injury occurs as a result of an act of family violence, or the agent is the child's parent/guardian. When the injury is intentional and causes up to 15 days of disability, the penalty will be 60 to 125 days of community service.
5.3.3 Are false accusations punishable for the victim?
Yes, according to Article 402 of the Peruvian Criminal Code, anyone who falsely attributes a punishable act to another will be punished with imprisonment for no more than three years and 180 to 365 days of community service.
5.3.4 How is consent discussed in the law?

Regulations to Law No. 30364 only mention consent in Article 61, which pertains to sexual violence, and provides guidelines according to the following:

61.1.    Consent cannot be inferred from any word or conduct of the victim when force, threat of force, coercion or exploitation of a coercive environment they have diminished their ability to give voluntary and free consent.

61.2.    Consent cannot be inferred from any word or conduct of the victim when they are unable to give free consent.

61.3.    Consent cannot be inferred from the silence or lack of resistance of the victim to the alleged rape.

61.4.    The credibility, honorability or sexual availability of the victim or a witness cannot be inferred from the sexual nature of the previous or subsequent behavior of the victim or a witness.

However, there are no additional definitions of consent under other gender-based violence situations.

5.3.5 Is self-defense or insanity a defense?
Yes, according to Article 20 of the Peruvian Criminal Code.
5.4 Witness status

5.4.1 What is a witness's duty to testify honestly and completely?
According to Article 163 of the Peruvian Criminal Procedure Code, a witness is compelled to truthfully answer the questions that are asked; otherwise, they will be punished with no less than two but no more than four years in prison according to Article 409 of the Peruvian Criminal Code. The witness also has a duty to appear and a duty to testify; otherwise, Article 371 of the Criminal Code will apply, which provides sanctions for those who abstain from testifying.
5.4.2 Who may abstain from testifying in certain situations?

According to Article 165 of the Peruvian Criminal Procedure Code, the cases in which persons may refrain from testifying are as follows:

1. The spouse of the accused, relatives within the fourth degree of consanguinity or second of affinity, and anyone who had a relationship with him may refrain from giving testimony. This power is extended, to the same extent, to relatives by adoption, and to spouses or those cohabiting even when the marital bond has ceased. All of them will be warned of the right that allows them to refuse to give testimony in whole or in part.

2. Those who must keep professional or state secrets according to the law must refrain from declaring details that will be described,:

(a) Those bound by professional secrecy may not be bound to testify about what they know because of their profession, except in cases in which they have an obligation to report it to the judicial authority. Among them are lawyers, ministers of religious services, notaries, doctors and health personnel, journalists or other professionals provided by express law. Nevertheless, these persons, with the exception of ministers of religious cults, may not deny their testimony when they are released by the interested party of the duty to keep the secret.

(b) If the information requested from the witness is not found, taking into account the exceptions provided in the law on the matter, the continuation of the declaration will be provided. If the information has been classified as secret or reserved and the judge considers the information essential, they will — ex officio or at the request of a party — require the information in writing and may even summon the public official to correspond on the witness initially placed for clarifications.

3. If Public officials and servants know of a state secret, that is, information classified as secret or reserved, they have an obligation to communicate it to the authority that cited them. In these cases, the diligence will be suspended and information will be requested from the minister of the sector, within a period of 15 days, specifying whether the required information is within the scope of the exceptions established in the law on the matter.

5.4.3 What potential "excuses" can a witness raise to refuse to testify in a domestic violence action?
According to Article 162 of the Criminal Procedure Code, persons who are unable to work for natural reasons or who are prevented by law are excused. Disqualification for natural reasons may be determined by physical or mental impairments that impede or limit the conditions of perception, or that prevent the transmission of perceptions in an intelligible manner and in the manner provided by law.[21] Legal impediments are functional or procedural in nature, depending on whether they affect judicial officials, prosecutors, secretaries, technical, administrative and auxiliary personnel who are familiar with the same process.[22] Judges may not be witnesses if they have previously intervened as judges in a case that they are called upon to resolve, in accordance with Article 53 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Witnesses may abstain from testifying in cases involving family members within the fourth degree of consanguinity or second degree of affinity under Article 165 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
5.4.4 What is the impact of domestic violence on witnesses who are children?
Article 19 of the Law No. 30364 mentions that when the victim is a girl, boy, adolescent or woman, their statement must be made under the same conditions as the pre-designed test.
5.4.5 Can children be called upon to testify?
Yes, Article 171(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code mentions that when you receive testimony from minors and people who have been victims of events that have affected them psychologically, they can arrange to give testimony in private. If the testimony was not given under the rules of the advanced test, the judge will adopt the measures necessary to guarantee the emotional integrity of the witness and will arrange for the attendance of a psychologist, who will carry out the interrogation proposed by the parties. It will also allow for the attendance of a relative of the witness.
5.4.6 What is the effect of a child victim on the charges against the offender?

According to Article 121(B) of the Criminal Code, when the victim is a minor, over 65, or suffers from a physical or mental disability and the agent takes advantage of this condition, a prison sentence of no less than six and no more than 12 years is applicable.

5.5 Penalties and sentencing; penalty enhancements

5.5.1 What are the penalties and sentencing laws for first-time domestic violence offenses?

The Peruvian Criminal Code establishes penalties for anyone who commits crimes related to family violence; however, it does not establish specific penalties for first-time domestic violence offenses.

On the other hand, item 29(b) of Recommendation 35 states that states should protect victims/survivors of gender-based violence and ensure that they have access to justice and to an effective remedy in line with the guidance provided in General Recommendation No 33.

As indicated in item 5.1, the Peruvian legislation ensures the protection of women and children who suffer from domestic violence.[23] However, this is implemented poorly as most of the procedures are never completed. This explains the increasing cases of domestic violence in Peru.
5.5.2 Are there criminal penalties?

Yes, the Peruvian Criminal Code provides for the following penalties:

Peruvian Criminal Code — Article 108-B (Femicide)

Prison term of no less than 20 years for killing a woman as a result of any of the following:

  • family violence
  • coercion, harassment or sexual harassment
  • abuse of power, trust or any other position or relationship that confers authority of the aggressor over the victim
  • any form of discrimination against women, regardless of whether there is a martial relationship or cohabitation

Prison term of not less than 30 years if the following aggravating circumstances are present:

  • The victim was a minor or an older adult.
  • The victim was pregnant.
  • The victim was under the care or responsibility of the aggressor.
  • The victim was previously subjected to rape or mutilation.
  • The victim was disabled.
  • The victim was subjected to human trafficking or human exploitation.
  • The act of violence occurred in the presence of a child or adolescent.
  • The act of violence occurred while the aggressor was intoxicated (over the blood alcohol level of 0.25) or under the effects of toxic drugs, narcotics, psychotropic or synthetic substances.

Life sentences in prison are applicable if two or more aggravating circumstances are present.

Peruvian Criminal Code — Article 441 (Intentional injury and negligent injury)

  • Community service of 40-60 days if an aggressor causes injuries that require up to 10 days of assistance or rest or a small level of psychological damage
  • Community service of 80 working days if an aggressor causes injury to a person under the age of 14, or the aggressor is the injured person's guardian, guard, or person responsible for the victim
  • If the injury is caused by fault and causes up to 5 days of incapacity, the penalty is 60-120 days

Peruvian Criminal Code — Article 442 (Mistreatment)

Community service of 50-80 days is applicable for physical or psychological mistreatment, humiliation, denigration or disparagement that does not cause injury or psychological damage. Community service of 80-100 working days is applicable under the following circumstances:

  • The victim is a minor or older adult, has a disability or is pregnant.
  • The victim is a spouse, ex-spouse, cohabitant or some other type of familial relationship, or is the person with whom the victim has children (regardless of whether they are living together at the time of the violent acts).
  • The victim has a professional services contract or employment relationship (including as a domestic worker) with the aggressor, or the victim is dependent on the aggressor (either due to confinement or another type of dependence), or the victim is under the aggressor's care and responsibility.
  • The victim is a member of the Peruvian National Police, the Armed Forces, a magistrate of the Judicial Branch or the Public Ministry, a magistrate of the Constitutional Court, or an elected authority and the injury occurred during the exercise of those duties or because of those duties.
  • The victim is a woman, and is injured as a result of family violence, coercion, harassment, sexual harassment, abuse of power or trust, or any other form of discrimination.
  • A child or adolescent was present during the act of violence.
  • The act of violence occurred while the aggressor was intoxicated (over the blood alcohol level of 0.25) or under the effect of toxic drugs, narcotics, psychotropic or synthetic substances.

Peruvian Criminal Code — Article 121-B (Serious injuries due to violence against women and members of the family group)

A prison sentence of no less than six years and no more than 12 years may be imposed for a serious injury under the following circumstances:

  • The victim is a woman, who is injured as a result of:
    • family violence
    • coercion, harassment or sexual harassment
    • abuse of power, trust or any other position or relationship that confers authority of the aggressor over the victim
    • any form of discrimination against women, regardless of whether there is a martial relationship or cohabitation
  • The victim is pregnant.
  • The victim is a spouse, ex-spouse, cohabitant or has some other type of familial relationship with the aggressor, or has children with the aggressor (regardless of whether they are living together at the time of the violent act).
  • The victim is any type of dependent or subordinate of the aggressor (such as employment, economic or care) and the aggressor took advantage of the situation.
  • The aggressor used a weapon, sharp object or instrument to commit the violence.
  • The victim was a child or adolescent and suffered psychological damage due to family violence or rape.
  • The act of violence occurred while the aggressor was intoxicated (over the blood alcohol level of 0.25) or under the effect of toxic drugs, narcotics, psychotropic or synthetic substances.

A prison sentence of no less than 12 years and no more than 15 years may be imposed if two or more of the above circumstances are present. A prison sentence of no less than 15 years and no more than 20 years may be imposed if the victim dies as a result of the above circumstances and the aggressor was able to foresee the outcome.

5.5.3 What is the result of a violation of an existing order for protection?

Article 24 of the Law to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence against Women and Members of the Family Group Law No. 30364 provides that anyone who disobeys, fails to comply with or resists a protective measure issued in a proceeding arising from acts of violence against women or members of the family group commits the offense of resisting or disobeying the authority provided for in the Criminal Code.

Article 368 of the Peruvian Criminal Code provides that the disobedience of a protective order arising from an act constituting violence against women or members of the family group is punishable by a prison term of no less than five years and no more than eight years.
5.5.4 What fines and other penalties are imposed besides incarceration and liberty restriction?

The Law to Prevent, Punish and Eradicate Violence against Women and Members of the Family Group Law No. 30364 provides the following:

Title II, Chapter 11, Article 22. Object and types of protective measures

  • removal of the aggressor from the victim's home
  • impediment of the aggressor approaching or being within a suitable distance from the victim in any way (including home, work center, study center or another place where the victim carries out their daily activities)
  • prohibition of the aggressor communicating with the victim (including via letter, telephone, electronics, chat, social network, institutional network, intranet and other forms of communication)
  • prohibition of the aggressor possessing and carrying weapons, and revocation of the license to possess and use weapons
  • prohibition on the accused person removing children, adolescents or other vulnerable persons from the care of the family group

Title II, Chapter I, Article 20. Sentence

In the case of a conviction or a reservation of conviction, this is in addition to the provisions of Article 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, promulgated by Legislative Decree No. 957, and where applicable, contains the following:

  • restrictions provided for in Article 288 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as well as other analogous rules
  • registration of the sentence in the National Conviction Registry and in the Single Registry of Victims and Aggressors
  • any other measure in favor of the victims or their relatives

Title III, Chapter II, Article 31. Prison treatment for the social reintegration of aggressors deprived of their liberty

This provides for re-education treatment for the granting of prison benefits, pardons and commutations of sentences.

Title III, Chapter II, Article 32. Treatment of aggressors in a free environment

For crimes related to acts of violence against women and members of the family group, the judge may require the aggressor to participate in psychosocial, psychiatric or self-help treatment specialized in violence against women and members of the family group.

Law No. 30364 establishes many measures that are aligned with item 32 of Recommendation 35.
5.6 Post-release restrictions

5.6.1 Does the law notify the victim of the offender's release from custody?
No, but the victim, being part of the process, has the right to know all the procedural acts.