Yes, the judge or prosecutor may agree to keep or reduce the working hours of the woman who is in a situation of violence, without affecting her labor and salary rights, and order the removal of the aggressor of sexual harassment from the workplace.
Notably, Law 348 includes workplace violence as a form of violence against women, defined as any action that occurs in any work environment by any person who discriminates, humiliates, threatens or intimidates women, who hinders or subordinates their access to employment, permanence or promotion, and who violates the exercise of their rights.
Article 21 of Law 348 includes the main measures to be implemented by the Ministry of Labor in relation to violence against women, highlighting its duty to protect them against all forms of sexual harassment or harassment in the workplace, and the adoption of internal and administrative procedures for reporting, investigating, service notice, prosecuting and punishing. Furthermore, a system of flexibility and tolerance needs to be adopted in the workplace for women in situations of violence, guaranteeing their labor rights.
On the other hand, in compliance with Supreme Decree No. 23425, of 15 March 1993, and Article 31 of Law 263, in coordination with the IOM, “Solidarity Scholarships” have been granted to victims of trafficking and smuggling for their educational and labor reintegration.[16]No, the law does not include any specific provisions on this matter.
The only references to issues related to gender discrimination are those contained in Law 370, the Migration Law, which specifically mentions the rights and obligations of migrant women. Among the principles that should govern migration policy are the principles of nondiscrimination and gender equity. However, no special protection or asylum is regulated in matters of migration due to domestic violence.
Yes, the judge in charge of issuing a ruling must attend the hearing and the incorporation of evidence based on which they will be able to pass their sentence. Consequently, the principle of equality of the parties before the judge implies that the parties to proceedings enjoy the exercise of their rights and procedural guarantees, without discrimination or privilege of one in relation to the other.[17]
Additionally, the child or adolescent is guaranteed participation in all proceedings in which they is a party and will be heard by the judicial authority, who will always take into account their age and the characteristics of their stage of development as stated in the Child and Adolescent Code, 23 July 2014.[18]The law does not include any barriers to prevent landlords from forcing a tenant to move out. However, regarding protective measures that may be ordered by the competent authority (Article 36 of Law 348), the law allows to remove or restrict the aggressor from the marital home or the home where the woman in a situation of violence lives.
Furthermore, Section 5 of Article 36 allows for the woman to be returned to the home from which she was violently removed, when she so requests, with sufficient guarantees to protect her life and integrity.