Relevant background
The development of civil protection orders was due to the recognition that criminal law was inadequate in dealing with issues of domestic violence. Some of the often cited reasons for criminal law being inadequate include the following:
Civil protection orders are civil in nature and meant to grant fast protection to domestic abuse victims. The primary goal of civil protection orders is to protect domestic abuse victims, as opposed to criminal law, which places greater emphasis on punitive justice.
In Singapore, civil protection orders in the domestic abuse context are commonly sought under the Women's Charter (Chapter 353), but it is also possible to obtain civil protection orders under other statutes, as will be addressed below. Given the above, the following analysis will focus mainly on the Personal Protection Orders in the Women's Charter.
Yes. Civil protection orders in Singapore can primarily be found in the form of Personal Protection Orders to stop family violence. The scope of these is described in the Women's Charter, in Sections 64 and 65.
Outside of the Women's Charter:
Persons who may petition for civil protection orders under the Women's Charter include (see Sections 64 and 65):
Yes, see also response to question 1 on the CYPA's provisions.
Other relevant provisions in the CYPA include:
There are also provisions in the Women's Charter (not limited to domestic abuse situations) that allow for a child to be placed in temporary custody, in the appropriate circumstances (e.g., see Section 125, 126).
There are different avenues for protective orders and protective orders can be sought on an expedited basis.
Personal Protection Orders under the Women's Charter can be granted on an expedited basis where the court is satisfied that there is imminent danger of family violence being committed (see Section 66). The expedited order will automatically expire after: (a) the expiration of a period of 28 days beginning on the date the order is made; or (b) the date of commencement of the hearing for a Women's Charter Personal Protection Order, unless it is extended by the court on the application by the victim or any person to whom the Protection Order applies (see Section 67).
Beyond the Women's Charter, other avenues for civil protection orders include the options addressed in the response to question 1.
Yes, in respect of the Women's Charter, please see the response to question 2.
Generally, the terms of civil protection orders granted in Singapore are not fixed and vary depending on the circumstances of the case.
For example:
To an extent, yes, but the protection conferred via the ex parte application will generally be for 28 days or will lapse upon commencement of the hearing for the civil protection orders.
Expedited civil protection orders under the Women's Charter
For expedited orders, the court may make the protection order notwithstanding that the summons has not been served on the respondent or has not been served on the respondent within a reasonable time before the hearing of the application; or that the summons requires the respondent to appear at some time or place.
As explained above, the expedited order will automatically expire either:
Outside of the expedited order scenario and, in any case, during the hearing for the personal protection order application (after the expedited order lapses), the aggressor will be present for cross-examination.
There is no automatic extension of protection, but separate protection orders can be obtained if the circumstances justify a protection order for family members.
Under the Women's Charter, there does not appear to be an automatic extension of protection to family members of the victim when applying for an expedited order (see Section 66, which is silent on the matter).
However, depending on the circumstances of the case, the relevant family members may also be able to apply for expedited orders to protect themselves where there is an imminent danger of "family violence" being committed against them as well (Section 66). In this regard, the definition of "family violence" includes, broadly speaking, placing a family member in fear of hurt, causing hurt, wrongful confinement or restraining against the family member's will, and causing continual harassment with intent to cause anguish to the family member (see Section 64, definition of "family violence").
The resources we have located to date include:
See https://www.familyjusticecourts.gov.sg/what-we-do/family-courts/family-protection for an overview of the process.
Overview
For protection orders under the Women's Charter, any document that can support an order being granted should be submitted. Prior to the hearing, if the respondent admits to the allegations and consents to the application, the court may issue a protection order.
However, if there is no amicable resolution of the matter, parties will have to prepare witness statements for purposes of the hearing.
Yes, the victim will need to attend the hearing proper.
If the victim is afraid to see the respondent in court, then he/she may discuss with the staff at the Family Protection Centre (located in the family justice courts) about attending the court mentions at a video-link agency. However, this video-link option is not available for the hearing proper.
Depending on the context of the question:
Time bars
There does not appear to be a strict time bar for making the Women's Charter applications. However, the currency of the allegations made will undoubtedly factor into the judge's decision on whether to grant a protection order.
Court timelines
The family justice court will set the court-related timelines. If a party fails to turn up for their court dates (i.e., mentions date, trial date, counselling session date), the general practice is the following:
Yes, expedited orders under the Women's Charter can be made notwithstanding:
Please see also the response to question 8, which describes timelines for the expedited order's lapse.
The judge has discretion to decide.
The Personal Protection Orders of the Women's Charter are civil in nature and not criminal. Therefore, the standard of proof required for obtaining these orders is on a "balance of probabilities" as opposed to "beyond reasonable doubt."
Beyond the above standard of proof, it is within the presiding judge's discretion on whether to grant the Women's Charter protection order, with regard to whether it is "necessary for the protection or personal safety of the [victim]."No age limit in respect of persons who can be afforded protection.
However, please see the response to question 2 on the parties that may apply for protection orders under the Women's Charter.
General tortious actions
Under the Singapore Limitation Act, actions in tort cannot be commenced more than six years after the cause of action accrues. The basic principle underpinning awards of damages in tort is to restore the plaintiff/victim to his/her position had the tort not been committed.
A. Physical abuse/trespass related
Victims can sue under established tortious causes of action, which commonly include the following:
B. Mental/emotional abuse related
While it is possible in theory to sue for psychiatric harm in Singapore, it would generally be difficult in practice for victims to prove the actual damage suffered (typically a recognizable psychiatric illness (distinct from emotions such as sorrow and grief), which may require the use of expert witnesses) and causation.
See also the sections on "Assault" and "False imprisonment" above and the relevant statutory torts below.
C. Financial abuse
Under Singapore law, it does not appear financial abuse in itself is actionable in tort per se.
Statutory torts
Civil proceedings may be brought for breaches of certain torts that are codified under Singapore statute.
A. Statutory torts under the PHA (civil)
The PHA establishes a number of statutory torts that allow victims to bring civil proceedings in respect of the following conduct:
This involves the aggressor using or making threatening, abusive or insulting words, behavior or communications, or publishing any identity information of the victim or related person, which results in causing the victim harassment, alarm or distress.
This involves the aggressor using or making threatening, abusive or insulting words, behavior or communications, which is heard, seen or otherwise perceived by the person (i.e., victim) and is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress.
This essentially involves the aggressor using conduct or words with the intent to cause the victim to believe that unlawful violence will be used or to provoke the use of unlawful violence.
Unlawful stalking is broadly defined as acts or omissions associated with stalking, such as following, making certain types of communications, entering or loitering near the victim or related persons' frequented areas, interfering with the victim's property or keeping the victim or related person under surveillance. The aggressor must have intended or known that such conduct would likely cause harassment, alarm or distress, and the conduct must have inflicted the same on the victim.
The civil court hearing the matter, if satisfied on a balance of probabilities, may award such damages of the victim in respect of the statutory tort(s) above having regard to all circumstances of the case, as it considers just and equitable.
B. Action for wrongful act causing death
Section 20 of the Civil Law Act allows an action to be brought in respect of a victim whose death was caused by any wrongful act, neglect or default that would have entitled the victim to maintain an action and recover damages.
Such action must be for the benefit of the dependents of the victim and the action must be brought within three years after the death of the victim. Dependents are defined as:
An action under Section 20 of the Civil Law Act may consist of or include a claim for damages for bereavement (in the sum of SGD 15,000).
Compensation following conviction of criminal offense — Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) Section 359
The relevant criminal court must, after convicting the accused, consider whether to make an order for the accused to pay a sum to be fixed by the court by way of compensation to the person injured.
An order made under Section 359 of the CPC will not affect any right to a civil remedy in respect of the same injury (which may seek a greater quantum of damages). However, the sum paid pursuant to this compensation order will be deemed to have satisfied part of the eventual civil damages awarded.