Yes. Under the PADVL, courts can issue protection orders to protect any person suffering from domestic violence. The employee must be (or have been) in a domestic relationship with the respondent. The domestic violence can include stalking, etc., and does not need to have happened within the employee's home.
In addition, the organization can bring the application for the protection order to the court on behalf of the complainant (employee) as long as they have an interest in the well-being of the complainant, and have their consent.No statutory allowance, except for casual leave.
A principle of Nigerian law is that the law cannot be used as an engine of fraud or illegality ("Re Burgle Press," (1961) Chapter 270).
There's no legal provision, so this may depend on the exercise of administrative discretion by an immigration officer or if the immigrant applies to court for relief under Chapter IV of the Nigerian Constitution dealing with fundamental human rights.
VAPPA does not discuss asylum accessibility.
It appears it can only be administrative (by a superior officer) where the abusive officer is not court-martialed for scandalous conduct unbecoming of an officer. However, where they are court-martialed, a military protection order can be made by the court under the Armed Forces Act. The order could only be made by a court-martial.
Yes. The "interest of the child" rule, as espoused in OKOBi v. OKOBI (2020) 1 NWLR (pt. 1705) 301.
Yes.
No.
Under Section 7(1) of the PADVL the order will prohibit the respondent from entering the following places, in particular: