1. What does the applicable law provide regarding the treatment of IP license agreements in insolvency proceedings in your jurisdiction?
Jump to
1. What does the applicable law provide regarding the treatment of IP license agreements in insolvency proceedings in your jurisdiction? Start Comparison
1 (a). What are the general principles of the treatment of IP license agreements in insolvency proceedings? Is there a difference depending on the type of proceeding (e.g., a court-appointed receivership, a bankruptcy, a restructuring, etc.)?

Under German law, licensed IP rights fall into the insolvency estate.

The insolvency administrator (or, in case of debtor-in-possession proceedings, the management of the debtor) is in a position to decide on the fate of the license based on the right to choose whether the contractual relationship should be fulfilled or terminated. If the insolvency administrator choses fulfillment, the obligations under the license have to be fulfilled by both parties. If the administrator refuses performance, the licensee will only have a damage claim in the rank of an unsecured insolvency claim.

There is one exception; where a license agreement has been "fully performed" by both parties according to German insolvency law, the trustee cannot decide whether the contractual relationship should continue to be fulfilled. However, the assessment of whether the license agreement is therefore insolvency-proof depends on the circumstances of each case.

At the moment, neither legislation nor case law provides general guidance on making a license agreement insolvency-proof. Several attempts to introduce legislation to this effect have failed so far.
1 (b). What are the laws governing the treatment of IP license agreements in insolvency proceedings?
The treatment of IP licenses follows Sec. 35 and Sec. 103 et seq. of the German Bankruptcy Code (InsO).