[Last updated: 1 January 2025, unless otherwise noted]
4.1 Types of takeover bids
There are two main forms of takeover bids in Italy:
- a voluntary takeover bid, in which a bidder voluntarily makes an offer for all or part of the outstanding voting securities issued by the target company; and
- a mandatory takeover bid, in which an investor is required to make an offer for the purchase of all outstanding voting securities of a listed target company if:
- as a result of an acquisition of voting securities of a listed company, such investor crosses – alone or acting in concert with others – a threshold of 30% of the voting securities of such company ("30% Threshold"), which threshold is reduced to 25% if such company does not qualify as an SME and no other person owns a greater participation ("25% Reduced Threshold"). The articles of association of a listed company that qualifies as an SME may vary the aforesaid 30% threshold to a different percentage ranging from 25% to 40% of the voting securities ("SME Threshold");
- the investor, who already holds (A) more than the 30% Threshold of a listed company or, in case the listed company qualifies as an SME company, the applicable SME Threshold, but (B), in all cases, less than 50% of the voting securities of such listed company, directly or indirectly acquires more than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of such listed company over any 12 month period;
- the investor crosses the 30% Threshold (or the 25% Reduced Takeover Threshold or the applicable SME Takeover Threshold, as the case may be) by acquiring voting securities of another company (whether listed or not), the main assets of which consist of the voting securities held in the listed target
With regard to the obligation to launch a mandatory takeover bid for any violation of the restrictions to acquire voting securities in the target company after the takeover bid period, see under 7.4 below.
Generally speaking, in the context of a mandatory takeover bid:
- the bidder must address its offer without distinction to all the holders of voting securities;
- the consideration is determined according to criteria set forth in the law; and
- the bid is unconditional.
On the contrary, in the context of a voluntary takeover bid:
- the bidder is free to make the takeover bid;
- the bidder is in principle free to determine, among other things, the quantity of the voting securities it intends to purchase and the consideration it intends to pay; and
- the bidder may subject the offer to certain conditions precedent.
While voluntary and mandatory takeover bids share some common features, they also present some differences.
In particular, with regard to the similarities, in both scenarios:
- the offer, once launched, is irrevocable;
- the bidder must offer the same consideration to all the holders of voting securities of the same class;
- prior to launching the offer, the bidder must ensure that it can fulfil the obligation to pay the overall consideration assuming full acceptance of the offer;
- the bidder must immediately submit the Initial Notice to CONSOB (concerning the decision to launch a voluntary takeover bid or the obligation to launch a mandatory takeover bid). At the same time, the bidder must publicly disclose such decision or obligation;
- the bidder must file an offering document (Documento di Offerta) concerning the bid with CONSOB for the latter's approval within 20 days following the date of the Initial Notice referred to above;
- the board of directors of the target company must issue a statement where it gives its views on the adequacy of the consideration offered and the effects of a successful completion of the takeover on (i) the interests of the target company; (ii) employment and conditions of employment at target company level; and (iii) continued operations at existing sites;
- transparency and fair conduct rules, as set forth by CONSOB Resolution No. 11971/99, apply from the Initial Notice to CONSOB until the date set for payment of the consideration;
- the "best price rule" applies, i.e., if during the period between the Initial Notice and the date of payment of the consideration offered by the bidder of a takeover bid, the bidder or any persons acting in concert with it acquire, directly or indirectly, outside of the bid voting securities that are the subject of the bid at a price higher than the offered price, the offered price must be revised to reflect such higher price; and
- following either a voluntary takeover bid or a mandatory takeover bid for the entire share capital of an Italian listed company:
- if the bidder ends up holding more than 90% of the voting securities of the target company, the so-called "sell- out right" arise in favor of the remaining shareholders of the target company (see under 7 below);
- if the bidder ends up holding at least 95% of the voting securities of the target company, the so-called "sell- out right" and the so-called "squeeze-out right" arise in favor of the remaining shareholders of the target company and the bidder, respectively (see under 7 below).
4.2 Differences between voluntary and mandatory takeover bids
The main differences between a voluntary and a mandatory takeover bid are summarized in the following table:
|
Mandatory takeover bids |
Voluntary takeover bids |
Consideration |
The minimum price must not be lower than the highest price paid by the bidder (and any person acting in concert) for voting securities of the target company in the 12 month period prior to the Initial Notice.
If no purchases of voting securities of the target company were made in the aforesaid 12 month period, the price must not be lower than the weighted average trading price for the voting securities of the target company during the 12 months prior to the Initial Notice.
Exceptions to the foregoing are regulated by CONSOB.
|
Determined by the bidder, except when the best price rule applies.
|
Conditions precedent
|
The offer is unconditional
|
The offer may be subject to certain conditions (such as a minimum acceptance level, MAC clauses relating to the target, war clause, financial covenants, non-insolvency clauses, etc.), but may not be subject to conditions whose occurrence is solely within the bidder’s discretion.
|
Acceptance period
|
Between 15 and 25 trading days (but may be reopened)
|
Between 15 and 40 trading days (but may be reopened).
|
Pro rata rule
|
N/A |
If only a specified number of voting securities are to be purchased, the bid should provide that tenders will be accepted on a pro rata basis if the number of voting securities tendered exceeds the number of voting securities to be purchased.
|
Amendments to the bid
|
N/A |
Only those amendments which result in better terms and conditions of the bid, i.e., a greater consideration offered, are permissible. Reductions in the quantity of voting securities to be purchased are not permitted.
|
Competing bids
|
N/A |
Permissible up to five trading days before the end of the acceptance period of the prior takeover bid.
|
Exemptions
|
The main exemptions to the obligation to launch a mandatory takeover bid apply in the following cases:
- an investor comes to hold more than 30% of the voting securities as a result of a takeover bid addressed to all the shareholders;
- another shareholder or other shareholders jointly hold more than 50% of the voting rights of the target;
- the 30% Threshold (or the 25% Reduced Threshold, where applicable) is exceeded:
- in connection with a recapitalization of the target company (or other intervention aimed at strengthening the target company’s equity) and the target company is in a documented financial distress;
- by intragroup transfers;
- by exercising pre-existing subscription, conversion or pre- emption rights;
- and the investor undertakes to transfer voting securities to unrelated parties or to reduce the voting rights in excess within 12 months and not to exercise the voting rights attaching to the excess securities;
- as a consequence of the purchase of derivative financial instruments, the investor undertakes to transfer derivative instruments or voting securities to unrelated parties in excess within 6 months and not to exercise the voting rights attaching to the excess securities;
- as a consequence of mergers or spin- offs approved by the shareholders’ meeting without the contrary vote of the majority of the attending shareholders, different from, among other things, the shareholder or shareholders which jointly or individually hold an absolute or relative majority shareholding that is over 10% (the so called 'whitewash mechanism');
- as a result of inheritance or donations; and
- as a result of a voluntary takeover bid for at least 60% of the voting securities of the target company (the so-called "Pre-emptive Bid"), provided that:
- the bidder (or persons acting in concert with it) has not purchased more than 1% of the voting securities of the target company in the 12 months prior to or during the Pre-emptive Bid;
- the effectiveness of the Pre-emptive Bid has been made subject to the condition precedent of an approval of shareholders of the target holding a majority of the relevant securities (excluding the shareholding held by the bidder, (ii) the (absolute or relative) majority shareholder where its shareholding exceeds 10%, and (iii) by persons acting in concert with the bidder) (the so-called 'whitewash mechanism'); and
- CONSOB grants the exemption after verifying satisfaction of the conditions above.
|
N/A |
Consequences of a failure to launch the bid
|
- Statutory suspension of the voting rights attached to the all securities held by the bidder (and any persons acting in concert with it) in the target company;
- the voting securities exceeding the relevant thresholds must be disposed of within 12 months or, alternatively, CONSOB may request the bidder to launch a mandatory takeover bid and set the price thereof; and
- administrative fines comprised between EUR 25,000 and the total amount payable by the bidder or which would have been payable by the bidder had the takeover bid actually been implemented.
|
N/A |