The concept of legal professional privilege in Singapore can be broadly divided into legal advice privilege and litigation privilege.
Legal advice privilege covers all confidential communications between a party and their advocate and solicitor. Legal advice privilege prevents an advocate or solicitor employed by a party from:
This privilege applies whether or not litigation is contemplated in respect of communications by the client and by third-party agents of the client who communicate merely as conduits. Where the third party does not communicate as a mere agent or conduit of the client, there are dicta from the Singapore Court of Appeal that such communications may nonetheless be privileged if the communication is made for the dominant purpose of seeking legal advice.
Litigation privilege covers all communications between a party and its lawyer, as well as communications with other third parties that were made for the predominant purpose of litigation. Litigation privilege protects from disclosure all information and materials created and collected for the sole or dominant purpose of litigation, including communications between the client and the client's legal professional adviser or between third parties and the client's legal professional adviser, whether or not they were made as an agent of the client and whether confidential or otherwise. In order for litigation privilege to apply, there must be a reasonable prospect of litigation.
Although both legal advice privilege and litigation privilege are embodied in the Evidence Act, reference to English law principles is permitted unless those principles are inconsistent with the Evidence Act.