There is no regulatory restriction for the insurance company or the bank to provide exclusivity, although it may be prudent to undertake a competition analysis given the broad application of, and significant penalties for breach under, the Antimonopoly Act in Japan.
Although it may not be an insurer’s typical obligation, it is possible to oblige an insurer to provide support to the bank by sending individuals to guide and train the bank’s staff or second personnel to assist with the marketing and sale of the bancassurance products.
As the banks are under a strict duty to maintain confidentiality and secrecy, banks may not normally allow the insurer the right to access their customer database especially non-public financial information, unless the customer gives consent.
We are generally not aware of any issues related to compensation/cost of distribution of bancassurance products.
It is possible to have a provision allowing the bank to terminate the exclusive relationship if the insurer is unable to develop or refuses to develop a bancassurance product or cease to offer a bancassurance product.
We are generally not aware of any issues related to JDIP. It may not be common for insurers and banks to jointly develop intellectual property.
The position will vary depending on the reason for the early termination and which party is at fault.
The parties can have a provision requiring the insurer to pay a larger amount in the first period among some separate periods.
Yes, it is possible to have such indemnity clause in the bancassurance agreement.
Composition of bancassurance steering committee (BSC); frequency of BSC meetings; quorum for BSC meetings; matters falling within the scope of the BSC; decision-making process and proposed resolutions if there is a deadlock in the BSC are typical issues to consider when forming a BSC.