Home
Home
Contingent Worker Misclassification Risk Map and Comparison Tool
Comparison
Change Jurisdictions
Change Topics
Select Subtopics
Overall risk information
Is there any specific legislation that determines that contingent workers should be treated as employees for (a) employment, (b) tax/social security or (c) pension purposes?
Is there a safe harbor for contingent workers for (a) employment, (b) tax/social security or (c) pension purposes? Safe harbor means being expressly excluded from the legislation or a particular category/classification under the legislation if certain conditions are met.
Are there any new developments coming up in relation to contingent workers? If so, please briefly describe them along with the timing.
What are the main risks of engaging contingent workers from an employment law perspective?
Consequences of violation – employment law perspective
What are the main risks of engaging contingent workers from a tax perspective?
Consequences of violation – tax perspective
What are the main risks of engaging contingent workers from a social security perspective?
Consequences of violation – social security perspective
What are the main risks of engaging contingent workers from a pensions (or other regulator) perspective?
Consequences of violation - pensions (or other regulator) perspective
Are there any wider tax compliance risks, e.g., senior accounting officer or corporate criminal offense of facilitating tax evasion?
What is the risk of criminal sanctions applying?
Overall risk rating
No subtopics found
Filter By Region
All
Jurisdictions
No countries found
0/250 Selected
Cancel
Next